Interdisciplinary Learning - Communication

Progression point 3.25

Progression point 3.5

Progression point 3.75

At 3.25, the work of a student progressing towards the standard at Level 4 demonstrates, for example:
At 3.5, the work of a student progressing towards the standard at Level 4 demonstrates, for example:
At 3.75, the work of a student progressing towards the standard at Level 4 demonstrates, for example:
Listening, viewing and responding
  • attentiveness to and understanding of ideas and information in peers’ oral presentations; for example, project reports in Science or the Humanities
  • relevance in the framing of questions about presentations
  • explication of their interpretation of others’ written or oral presentations
  • use of simple criteria and strategies to evaluate others’ presentations; for example, rubrics and Y-charts (looks like, feels like, sounds like)
Listening, viewing and responding
  • responsiveness to ideas and information in a variety of oral, written and visual forms, and on a range of topics and ideas
  • relevant questioning to improve their own understanding
  • recognition that others’ interpretations may be different from their own
  • understanding of the non-verbal strategies that presenters use to engage with audiences; for example, physical positioning, eye contact and gestures
Listening, viewing and responding
  • identification of main ideas and supporting detail in presentations
  • relevant questioning to improve understanding and provide feedback on oral and visual presentations
  • interest in and exploration of interpretations that differ from their own
  • reflection on their own and others’ presentations, noting features and strategies that make them effective for different purposes and audiences; for example, graphic symbols in public signs, and tables presenting survey data
Presenting
  • inclusion of a small number of related ideas in written, visual and oral presentations
  • communication of simple information through, for example, posters and short oral or written reports
  • use of a small range of presentation features to support meaning; for example, labels in Humanities presentations, and pauses and repetition when speaking to a group
  • awareness of audience by, for example, the use of props to hold the interest of a small group
Presenting
  • selection and linking of some ideas and information in presentations
  • control of a variety of presentation strategies; for example, appropriate pace of speaking, and use of different formats such as captioned photos
  • appropriate comments and questions to give feedback on others’ presentations
  • appropriate choices of language features in presentations; for example, correct naming of scientific instruments used in experiments
Presenting
  • organised structure, including a beginning, middle and end in short, prepared individual or group oral, written and visual presentations
  • use of a variety of formats; for example, pie charts and bar graphs, labelled diagrams or three-dimensional models in Health and Physical Education presentations
  • reflection on the quality of their own and others’ presentations
  • use of specialised language to support effective communication in different contexts; for example, terms such as ‘add’, ‘subtract’, ‘multiply’, ‘divide’ and ‘decimals’ in Mathematics
Interdisciplinary Learning - Design, Creativity and Technology

Progression point 3.25

Progression point 3.5

Progression point 3.75

At 3.25, the work of a student progressing towards the standard at Level 4 demonstrates, for example:
At 3.5, the work of a student progressing towards the standard at Level 4 demonstrates, for example:
At 3.75, the work of a student progressing towards the standard at Level 4 demonstrates, for example:
Investigating and designing
  • teacher-directed collection of data relevant to a design brief
  • generation of design ideas – labelled sketches and drawings, explanations or models – in response to a design brief
  • listing of at least three basic steps for a recipe or a product/system plan, or minor modification of an existing recipe or plan; for example, options for pizza toppings
Investigating and designing
  • contribution to a group design brief of requirements and/or limitations to that brief; for example, considering user/consumer needs
  • contribution to group research into an aspect of a design brief using an appropriate research method such as an Internet search, a questionnaire, trialing, collection of stimulus pictures and recipes
  • annotation of design ideas with reference to the intended function and/or appearance of the product
  • development of steps for a recipe or a product/system plan, or modification of an existing recipe or plan
Investigating and designing
  • teacher-assisted identification of evaluation criteria developed from a design brief
  • individual research into aspects of a design brief, using appropriate research methods; for example, Internet search, questionnaire, trialing, and collection of stimulus pictures and recipes
  • annotation of design ideas with reference to environmental or social constraints
  • development of detailed steps for a recipe or a product/system plan, or detailed modification of an existing recipe or plan
Producing
  • development of a production plan and, with teacher support, selection of appropriate tools, equipment, familiar materials, ingredients and/or system components, and processes
  • use of familiar tools and equipment, with teacher instruction on appropriate and safe handling
Producing
  • reference to the steps in their production plan to assist with the selection of tools and equipment, familiar materials, ingredients and/or system components, and production processes
  • following teacher demonstration, use of a range of production and finishing/presentation techniques
  • use of familiar and unfamiliar tools and pieces of equipment, with teacher direction on safety and hygiene
Producing
  • reference to their production plan to assist with the selection of unfamiliar tools and equipment, materials, ingredients and/or system components, and production processes
  • selection of and work with a variety of materials, ingredients and systems components to make a functional product using a range of production and finishing/presentation techniques
  • competent use of a range of tools and pieces of equipment, with teacher guidance on safety and hygiene
  • recording of dates and main production steps
Analysing and evaluating
  • oral reflection on their design as it is developed, using teacher-prescribed evaluation criteria
  • modifications to their design, in response to teacher feedback and with teacher support
Analysing and evaluating
  • oral and/or written reflection on their design as it is developed, using class-developed criteria
  • modifications to their designs/products/systems in response to teacher and peer feedback
  • awareness of at least one impact that a familiar product and/or technological system might have on people or the environment; for example, a battery-operated torch
Analysing and evaluating
  • oral and written reflection on their design as it is developed, using class-developed and their own evaluation criteria and justifying design choices
  • modification to their designs/products/systems in response to feedback from teacher and peers, and their own documented reflection
  • awareness of at least two impacts that a familiar product or technological system might have on people and/or the environment
Interdisciplinary Learning - Thinking Processes

Progression point 3.25

Progression point 3.5

Progression point 3.75

At 3.25, the work of a student progressing towards the standard at Level 4 demonstrates, for example:
At 3.5, the work of a student progressing towards the standard at Level 4 demonstrates, for example:
At 3.75, the work of a student progressing towards the standard at Level 4 demonstrates, for example:
Reasoning, processing and inquiry
  • with teacher guidance, development of simple questions for a whole-class or group investigation or response
  • collection of information for an investigation, report or response, and consideration of its worth or relevance
  • awareness of the differences between fact and opinion
  • organisation of collected information around ideas and concepts for practical application; for example, using a simple graphic organiser to sort information
  • use of organised information for problem solving and decision making in an investigation
  • with teacher guidance, development of an argument on a given topic
Reasoning, processing and inquiry
  • with peers, development and evaluation of key questions for an investigation or response
  • identification of useful and irrelevant or useless information or key words when collecting information for an investigation, report or response
  • identification, with teacher support, of facts and opinions related to an investigation on a given topic
  • development of conceptual knowledge through the organisation of information collected for an investigation, and its use in assisting problem solving and decision making
  • provision of supporting evidence in the development of arguments on a given topic
Reasoning, processing and inquiry
  • with teacher support, formulation of appropriate key questions for their investigations or responses
  • evaluation of the usefulness of information collected for investigations, reports or responses
  • with teacher support, discrimination between fact and opinion and their sources in investigations, reports and responses
  • with teacher support, consideration of various factors in the development of arguments on a given topic
Creativity
  • identification of possible ideas (new as well as those already tried) and solutions in familiar contexts including, with teacher support, development of selection criteria such as safety and relevance
Creativity
  • generation of multiple possibilities/responses using creative thinking in a variety of contexts
Creativity
  • use of creative thinking strategies such as questioning, brainstorming and mind mapping to solve problems in a variety of contexts
  • identification and explanation of how their self-generated ideas could be applied
Reflection, evaluation and metacognition
  • with teacher guidance, reflection on the effectiveness of a range of thinking processes and tools in particular contexts
  • awareness of how their ideas and understandings have changed, and use of examples in simple explanations
Reflection, evaluation and metacognition
  • with teacher prompting and support, evaluation of the effectiveness of their thinking processes and tools
  • use of appropriate terminology when articulating their thinking processes
  • systematic recording of changes in their thinking and understandings
Reflection, evaluation and metacognition
  • independent reflection on, and evaluation of, the effectiveness of their thinking processes and tools
  • use of appropriate terminology and provision of suitable examples when articulating their thinking processes
  • identification and documentation of how and why their ideas, understandings and beliefs have changed over time